![]()
Since its inception, the Telerobotics Program has been closely coordinated with the NASA organizations which are the intended recipients of the developed telerobotics technology. This coordination takes place at multiple levels, with the potential user community technology needs expressed both formally and informally to the program.
At the highest strategic level, the Advanced Technology and Mission Systems Division (ATMSD) of the Office of Space Science works with the user offices to develop an annual technology plan in support of the civil space program. The plans serves to describe the strategic direction for the NASA space research and technology programs, and as a strategic planning framework for other NASA and national participants in advocating and conducting technology developments that support future U.S. civil space missions. The integration of strategic requirements, directions and goals for the Space Telerobotics Program is incorporated within the planning process.
The plan is revised annually to reflect changes in mission planning, approval of new focussed and research base efforts, and progress in ongoing technology development efforts. Moreover, both the plan and derived ATMSD space technology programs are subjected to annual external and internal review to ensure continuing quality and relevance. In the case of the Telerobotics Program, that includes full involvement of the user communities (industry, university, and NASA) with the program as advocates, advisors, and requirements providers.
In addition to the formal submission of requirements from the user program offices to ATMSD via the strategic planning process, each user organization works informally with the Telerobotics Program at a more detailed level to transmit requirements to, and receive technology products from the program. This interchange typically takes place as part of the activities of the Telerobotics Intercenter Working Group (TRIWG), which actively guides the direction and strategy of the Telerobotics Program. The TRIWG consists of representatives from each organization participating in the Telerobotics Program, and meets quarterly to provide direction on the content and focus of the program. The TRIWG performs detailed technical reviews of the ongoing technology and application tasks, and coordinates the transfer of this technology to the user organizations. At each meeting, representatives of the user organizations are present to update the formal technology requirements and assess how the Telerobotics Program is responding to these requirements.
As these updated technology requirements are passed to the Telerobotics Program each year, the program is reassessed to determine the correlation between the requirements and the planned developments of the program. If appropriate, new tasks are initiated in the program to address new technology needs, or existing tasks may be re-targeted. At any given time, approximately 80% of the tasks within the program are targeted to address specific user requirements aligned with a specific planned mission (this is the "technology pull" portion of the program). The remaining 20% of the program is composed of tasks which address new innovative technologies. These technologies have been identified by the program as having a potential to significantly advance the state of the art, and worth investigating without a pre-identified user requirement (this is the "technology push" portion of the program).
The anticipated robotics requirements forwarded by the user offices to the Telerobotics Program during this past year are summarized in Figure 1-2.
| Space Flight and Space Station: |
Space Science: | Human Exploration and Development of Space: | Life and Microgravity Science: | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Requirements: | robot alignment systems | low mass (<10kg) and low volume (<1m^3) planetary surface rovers | robotic resource utilization | automation to reduce crew interaction |
| improved system performance and response times | long lifetime (>1000 days) robust rovers | sample acquisition and preservation | hazardous materials handling mitigation | |
| collision avoidance | lander-based sampling manipulators | advanced dexterous end-effectors | ampoule rupture detection | |
| command and control interfaces | autonomous vehicle operations (100x increase) | high-efficiency, long term actuators | high levels of autonomy | |
| ground control | planetary distance telepresence | robotic vision and perception systems | ||
| visual inspection | long distance (>10Km) mnavigation systems | microrovers and microinstruments | ||
| increased utilization of autonomy | hazard avoidance systems | advanced robotics for human exploration | ||
| automated leak detection | science goal identification systems | virtual presence and control | ||
| robotic tooling | miniaturized sensing and computing systems | |||
| fault tolerant architectures | objective level controls | |||
| robotic system dexterity | aerovehicles | |||
| verification testbeds and simulation facilities | ||||
| enhanced manipulator control | ||||
| Applicable Missions: | International Space Station maintenance (SPDM) | Mars Pathfinder | First Lunar Return | SpaceLab experiments |
| International Space Station operations (SPDM) | Mars Surveyor | Lunar south pole exploration | Space Station experiments | |
| on-orbit vehicle assembly and processing | Mars Sample Return | First Lunar outpost | Biotechnology and materials science payloads | |
| Venus Systems | Mars Exploration | |||
| Advanced robot surface systems | Permanently manned Lunar and Mars missions | |||
| Challenges: | multi-arm coordinated cooperative control | physical contact with planetary surfaces | unknown dust contamination characteristics | ultra safe operations in close proximity to humans |
| reduced on-orbit computational capability | uncertain knowledge of operating environment | low mass and volume constraints | long operational phases | |
| computation or communications-induced time delays | long operational phases | long-duration pre-deployment storage | low- to no-maintenance operations | |
| operational flexibiliity | radical reduction of life-cycle costs | low- to no-maintenance operations | flexibility to cope with unexpected experimental procedures | |
| lengthly robotic task timelines | global planetary access | widespread public participation | ||
| low-maintenance operations | high data rate science payloads, low command rates | global planetary access | ||
| human safety considerations | high speed simulation of complex systems | exploration of future human landing sites | ||
| reduction of EVA time | deep subsurface sampling |
Figure 1-2 Current Space Telerobotics User Requirements
The requirements described in this table represent data collected from the associated program offices during the annual "User Requirements" meeting of the TRIWG, held each fall. This data was presented by each program office as representative of their technology needs based on their mission plans at that time.